Computation skills demonstrated using whole numbers, fractions, decimals and percentages manually and with calculators.
Why HR leaders needs to be systems thinkers
Systems’ thinking is more complex than it first appears to be. So let's gather some background before we make a change. It underlines how crucial it is to only make judgements after considering their effects on the overall system.
While making plans, it's critical to keep in mind the numerous external circumstances that have an impact on the framework in which the workforce functions. Politics, society, religion, and other strong influences are examples of these external, systemic forces
Systems Thinking Applying as Workforce Strategy
What are the most important, systemic influences on the workforce around the organization, and how do these influences shape an HR strategy? Here are some examples of systems where the workforce is heavily influenced by an external factor. By definition, these systems face a unique set of challenges.
Industry | System(s) Exerting Influence | Impact on Workforce Plans |
Arrange workforce and trades people | Government regulations Right-to-work, collective bargaining | A firm has a lot of freedom to recruit and fire employees however it sees fit in the absence of organized labour. Workforce planning is governed by regulations and negotiating agreements that limit how a company may set up its staff when organized labour is a system component. |
Seasonal agricultural labor | Regulations governing agriculture workers and the availability of labour | Products are priced by manufacturers to reflect their particular expenses. A full-time, permanent workforce does not need to be planned for by manufacturers who have access to inexpensive, seasonal labor, but it is necessary for those that do not. |
Energy | Environmental responsibility, social pressures, worker safety, and government regulation | Government policies need quick changes in the workforce. The system as a whole consists of several interconnected units. The proportion of environmental and safety employees in the workforce rises during times of increased social pressure and/or tighter regulation. |
You'll notice that several industries on the chart have an all-or-nothing workforce, which isn't a formal word. Or, to put it another way, workforce planning is focused on a particular objective, and if the system turns against the company's objective, a workforce is not needed.
Systems thinking for organization design and management
Systems thinking is a problem-solving approach that sees complex organizations as a series of components, each of which interacts with and influences the others.
The approach can be applied to organizational management: the various departments, units and groups – components – of a large organization are seen to continuously interact and influence each other. In fact, they behave collectively as a system.
The performance of the system is largely determined by how the system is configured and how the elements interact, not simply the results of the actions or efforts of individuals.
Therefore, instead of looking at the efforts of individual employees, business leaders must take a 'whole system' perspective to maximize organizational performance.
Seeing the whole
To get the full picture, leaders need a deep knowledge of the entire organization, its various moving parts, and how each component affects the rest. But there is much more to systems thinking.
Business leaders must understand the adaptive nature of systems. As dynamic entities, systems adapt to changes imposed on them – often with unpredictable results.
Therefore, leaders need to know how their actions in any part of the system affect the whole. It is still rare that most senior managers spend enough time understanding their system, given the inevitable pressures on their time.
Supply and demand
Particularly in the public and private sectors, a huge gap in knowledge is a genuine understanding of the demand and supply sides of the equation.
First, how much demand is there on the system? When and where is the organization's output needed? What are the possible peaks, troughs and seasonal variations in demand? What external factors affect demand and how?
And most importantly, find out how much demand there is because the system isn't delivering what it should have supplied in the first place.
On the supply side, leaders need to understand their organization's ability to provide the goods and/or services it provides. How much staff time is being wasted through non-core activities or unnecessary work?
Systems theory can help leaders understand capacity constraints. This means they are better positioned to move through the system effectively and identify the resources needed for work to avoid deploying resources in the wrong place.
Behavior
Leaders must adopt the right management style and avoid a purely controlling mindset. They must recognize that the performance of their system is as much a factor in its design as the work performed by its employees.
Problems such as poor performance, low morale or stress in the workforce are often caused by problems within the system itself. Their focus should be on visualizing system problems – and in practice, not blaming the workforce for problems with design flaws in how processes and systems are configured.
Importance of systems thinking in HR
Creating a culture of systems thinking is not a quick task. It takes time to embed the knowledge and behaviors needed to make decisions and take actions that benefit the system as a whole.
With this in mind, systems thinking should not be the preserve of a select group of senior leaders.
A whole-of-systems perspective can only be achieved by developing the ability to map workflows and processes across the entire workforce. In this way, any change in the system can be initiated with a clear idea of the goals and purpose of the organization.
HR teams are already well placed to drive systems thinking in organizations, with a less targeted approach than employees in general and a better view across all departments.
While shifting an organization's culture can be a slow process, HR can initiate a whole-systems approach through their own processes, including onboarding and performance reflection.
This article is very interesting to read as systems thinking encourages the shift of perspective that's essential to dealing with the complexities of dynamic social systems, from office departments to organizations to entire economies. Systems theory can help leaders understand capacity constraints. This means they’re better placed to identify the resources needed for work to move effectively through the system and not apply resources in the wrong places (Walley, 2016). Systems thinking in management is the process of looking at how different groups or teams in a company work together and depend on each other to find ways to improve the organization's workflow and production. Leaders need to understand systems thinking to identify the root causes of problems and implement suitable systems and processes that help with problem solving and decision-making. There are key skills required for systems thinking, including identifying patterns and relationships within complex systems. Thinking critically and creatively, and communicating effectively. Analysing data, Recognizing the impact of feedback and delays on the system’s behaviour There are some challenges in system thinking, and those challenges are education and systems thinking, the delay between action and result, and how to provide big data for better organization models (Lanthan,2000).
ReplyDeleteK.P.AMILA SUDARSHANA PERERA, thank you for the comments, as you mention system thinking help to see the issue as a whole, hence system thinking is good approach for short out the organizational problems as holistic way. and further system thinking associate the tools in order to deep understanding of the surrounding before make the decisions and which lead to enhance the business performance. further It also enables us to explore opportunities for innovation and design our approaches for systems change.
DeleteGood article. Are there any potential drawbacks or limitations to a whole-systems approach, and how can these be mitigated?
ReplyDeleteTharinda Vithanawasam thank you for comments, systems thinking has limitations. When a system is genuinely complex, small changes made earlier can have significant effects later, and the feedback loops are impenetrable. Complex systems do not naturally lend themselves to systems thinking.
DeleteOne of the main disadvantages of a systems approach is how specialized it is. The same specific system cannot be used by many companies and sectors. The systems approach consequently does not provide a consistent idea that can be applied to all types of organizations.
The article reminded me how important systems thinking is in workforce strategy. Organizations can take a "whole system" approach to maximize performance. The system's structure and interactions affect success, not merely employees' efforts.
ReplyDeleteLeaders must understand how each aspect of the organization influences the others, as the article correctly states. Leaders must also comprehend systems' adaptability and how their actions affect the entire. Understanding supply and demand was another good aspect. Leaders must assess their company's ability to deliver goods and services and how much time is wasted on non-essential tasks.
How can leaders focus on the "whole system" rather than simply individual employee efforts?
Thank you for your comments that highlight the critical role of systems thinking in leadership. Leaders and businesses using systems thinking Because systems thinking focuses on emergent behavior, it helps understand the company's operations and the external environment in which it competes. This helps in saving time, money and other resources. A systems-based management strategy views the organization as a collection of dynamic, interrelated parts. Within the organization, each of these components is a department and a subsystem.
Delete